Can townhouses or a type different from dwellings in blocks be submitted? In principle, this does not appear to be the most rational. Nonetheless, the bidder could propose any type different from that of the open block provided that the regulations vis-à-vis setbacks, maximum plot occupancy, maximum buildable depth, separation between structures and so forth are complied with. Could a proposal of blocks of more than tour stories be justifiable? No. The maximum height would be four stories (ground floor plus three). With regard to the top floor, an attic - set back at least four metres from the building line - could be provided. We have an enquiry regarding the Navalcarnero site. Specifically, it concerns modification to the Local Plan where the development distribution tables are pixelised to the point that it is impossible to understand their content. Would you provide this information edited in a form in which the content can be viewed, specifically for the table entitled "capacidad habitacional susceptible de condicionar las infraestructuras del sector en la modificación del plan parcial de ordenación" (occupancy capacity subject to determining local plan infrastructure), which we consider essential for the competition solution? The key data is the following: Plot surface area: RC1 26,841.0 RC2 15,868.0 RC3 15,898.0 RC4 18,279.0 RC5 15,948.0 RC6 15,957.0 RC7 20,957.0m2 All include 65% occupancy above the ground (80% below the ground) and a buildable potential of 1.30 m2 / m2. Each is classed as affordable housing at a general price. The average floorspace per dwelling is a build size of 100m2. The maximum residential buildable potential per plot is expressed in the table below, setting aside the remainder, up to the using up of 1.30 m2 / 1.30m2 in compatible uses. RC1 32,091.3 RC2 17,704.3 RC3 19,068,5 RC4 20,654.7 RC5 17,801.4 RC6 19,156.0 RC7 23,658.1 m2 build size Finally, an average of 2.86 habitants per dwelling is estimated. Continuing on a different vein, we would like to know if there are any other regulations in addition to point six of the PGOU (Plan General de Ordenación Urbana, the Land Usage and Ruling Act) at Navalcarnero that make reference to the useable floorspace with which the different parts other dwellings must comply. The provisional regulations passed by Ministerial Order 29/05/1969, modified by Ministerial Order 04/05/1979, extended by Ministerial Order 16/05/1974 and modified by Ministerial Order 21/02/1981 specify: Floorspace and bedrooms: one bedroom is 14m2, two bedrooms is 16m2, three bedrooms is 18m2 and four bedrooms is 20m2. If they are concentrated in one part with a dining room and kitchen, the floorspace should be for one and two bedrooms 20m2, three and four bedrooms 24m2. If the kitchen is separate, it should have at least 7m2 that can be divided in 5m2 of kitchen and 2m2 of a laundry area (in which in all dwellings the possibility of drying washing externally without it being viewed from the a public thoroughfare). The minimum useable floorspace for two bedrooms should be 6m2 throughout the dwelling where there is a bedroom with a useable floorspace of 10m2. At the Navalcarnero site the plots to be developed are RC1, RC2, RC3, RC4, RC5, RC6 and RC7. In the panning regulations, in article 23, the uses are set out; in the same article blocks RC1, RC2 and RC7, as unregimented residential use, are also included. Does this mean that they are not included at the planned site? If this is not so, although the agenda is different would the percentages and sizes of the dwellings be the same as those anticipated on the remaining plots? The agenda for all the plots (from RC1 to RC7) is that of affordable housing at a general price, once the local modification has been processed. All the details are satisfactorily described in the information provided. We require a project development plan for the Barrio San Isidro at Navalcarnero. The plans are updated on the website. Reference is made to the possibility of including an attic, in the sense that this would mean ground floor, plus three stories, plus an attic. Is this correct? If so, would we be talking of a setback of four metres from the attic in relation to the building line of the façade or the thoroughfare, or any interior building façade also? Indeed, this would be a ground floor plus three stories and a setback attic four metres from the façade. In the case of a block being closed, it would not be necessary to set back the attic in relation to the façade facing the block inner courtyard. How are the dwelling terraces calculated? With regard to the calculation of the useable floorspace they are calculated as 50%. Concerning the calculation of buildable potential, they are calculated as 50% in the case of open structures being enclosed on three of their sides (PGOU, Plan General de Ordenacion, Land Usage and Ruling Act, article 3.6.2). How are the open balconies calculated on each story that is open to the façade? In the same way as the terraces are calculated, in relation to the buildable potential as 50% in the case of structures being enclosed on three of their sides. The aesthetic aspects of building conditions at Navalcarnero define a series of features with regard to façade materials, roof slope angle and availability of hollows (more in keeping with the old town than with the nature of the land included in the competition) characteristic of an open housing block. Since the planning bylaws themselves anticipate some interpretational leeway, we would like to know to what extent the aesthetic aspects of building conditions should be taken into account and, above all, which criteria would the competition panel follow? The competition panel will not consider appropriate a block of avant-guard affordable homes that has the same features as a dwelling found in the old town of Navalcarnero. In section 6.2 (Dwelling Typology) of the Technical Rules and Regulations of Barrio de San Isidro in Navalcarnero, it is stated that the approximate proportion of each type of dwelling (two- and three-bedroomed and those for large families) must be 30%, 60% and 5% respectively. Must these percentages be complied with on each of the plots at the site, or it is possible, for example, to focus on one of several single-type plots? The percentages are a guide; the most sought-after solution is the conservation of each plot. In the provided plans the contours are not to be found. Is this due to them being of no consequence as the land is practically flat or to omission by error? If the information has been omitted, will it be posted on the web site in the near future? A new file will be posted with the development contour lines. For Navalcarnero, must the distribution be for the entirety of the plots, designated RC from one to seven, or can it be for one of them? Your proposal, at this or any other location, must cover all the site plots.